strange thing

Tomsik · Post by **Tomsik** » April 25th, 2005, 1:23 pm

ver 0.9.1 realesed and on download page still is ver 0.8.11 for windows

Post by **turin** » April 25th, 2005, 1:27 pm

How is that strange? All it means is that 0.9.1 hasn't come out for windows yet. Just like that is what it meant when 0.9.0 came out.

Tomsik · Post by **Tomsik** » April 25th, 2005, 1:31 pm

1. someone should do win32 0.9.1 ver
2. there is posted ver 0.9 for windows

Post by **turin** » April 25th, 2005, 1:33 pm

1. No, there is nothing that says someone must do it. Someone will probably volunteer to do it, though.

2. OK, but apparently its creation wasn't reported to those who manage the website. Not a big deal.

Tomsik · Post by **Tomsik** » April 25th, 2005, 1:41 pm

turin wrote:1. No, there is nothing that says someone must do it. Someone will probably volunteer to do it, though.

i didnt said "must", i said "should".

IMO there should be win32 ver, its most popular OS.(its sad but its fact.)

scott · Post by **scott** » April 25th, 2005, 1:55 pm

Sithrandel already has the mac version of 0.9.1 out and uploaded. He's not part of the BFW project. He's a volunteer. When he builds the game he hands his result over to the project for the benefit of all. The mac community is fortunate to have him. If he's too busy, there are backup volunteers who pick up the slack.

The Windows community should expend some effort to put itself into the same situation. There was some build-sharing with 0.9.0, but I think it will just take time to get over being spoiled for so long.

Ankka · Post by **Ankka** » April 25th, 2005, 6:36 pm

scott wrote:Sithrandel already has the mac version of 0.9.1 out and uploaded. He's not part of the BFW project. He's a volunteer. When he builds the game he hands his result over to the project for the benefit of all. The mac community is fortunate to have him. If he's too busy, there are backup volunteers who pick up the slack.

This is awesome.

BIG THANKS to Sithrandel.

Post by **Dave** » April 26th, 2005, 2:06 pm

tomsik wrote:someone should do win32 0.9.1 ver

Okay. How about you?