The Hammer of Thursagan
Moderator: Forum Moderators
- Elvish_Pillager
- Posts: 8137
- Joined: May 28th, 2004, 10:21 am
- Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.
- Contact:
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
Not sure if this is practical, but I'd like to have some indication of how difficult the scenario is going to be before starting, so that I don't bring a grossly incorrect amount of forces on my first try.esr wrote:Good, that's about the gradient I was aiming for.Gameplay: The difficulty of the scenarios is widely varied. The first three scenarios were trivial; Invaders was quite difficult, since I hadn't made any Dwarvish Lords yet (I had three by the end); High Pass easy, Mages and Drakes somewhat tricky, Fear quite difficult.
Certain enemy types and terrain can help. Horsemen, as I mentioned previously (which both add some risk to you and offset the balance away from mostly-fighters.) A few enemy high-level mages (or any moderate HP, high attack units) would add some spice by making actual risk for your high-HP units, where currently the only risk is once they've been worn at for several turns. Remember also that you're not limited to simply giving each AI side a certain recruit list - you can engineer a force with the proportions you want, etc.esr wrote:You've unerringly put your finger right on the most serious design problem I had. Yes, it's difficult to be tactically interesting with a dwarves-only side. Jetryl and I have kicked around an idea for a unit line of barbarian troops that could represent (among other things) the Northern Alliance's human infantry and cavalry. Adding those to Aiglondur's recruit list would help.
Water also. Any other terrain is basically just "do I want to give the heroes 30% defense or 60% defense on this tile" but strategically placed water makes actually varied gameplay. The map of "Fear" is quite nice in this regard. (None of the other maps' water is nearly that effective, though. Also, consider more variety than just "each map will have a few everywhere-1-hex-wide rivers in it.")
I only recall the gryphon for scenarios where it's useful as a scout. Its tactical potential is cramped by the fact that you get no second chances with it (and it's less tough than all your other units.) Maybe allow you to recruit another whenever it dies? I'm sure you could come up with an excuse for that.esr wrote:Short of that, I tried to address the tactical-variety problem by giving him one gryphon and the loremaster.
The loremaster, of course, is pretty heavy-handed... maybe shift one of its abilities to the hero? I find it slightly disappointing to have a hero unit that's just the same as my other Dwarvish Lords, but with less HP or less speed (since he has Intelligent instead.)
This (and the "barbarian troops" idea) have a sneaky little problem: In order to make the added troops usable, you need to make them something that complements a dwarvish force. Almost nothing complements a dwarvish force.esr wrote:I have contemplated mainlining the Explorer unit from UtBS so THoT can use it.
The Mages are spot on. Give them earlier, perhaps?
No.esr wrote:Do you think allowing Aiglondur to recruit ulfserkers would be a good thing?
Right, but Elves? Bodyguarding doesn't help a lot when the enemies all have powerful ranged attacks. The only way you'll get decent experience for your Mages there is to feed them kills, and that really doesn't feel right roleplaying-wise (These mages haven't done anything for us, and now we're pampering them?)esr wrote:That was deliberate, too. One thing dwarven heavy infantry is particularly good for is bodyguarding mages. That's what you have to do.The fact that the next few scenarios after you get Mages are hard scenarios for Mages? Doesn't help...
"Fear" was fine. (incidentally, how did that scenario get its name? and why does the peasant run straight for his death?)
It's all fun and games until someone loses a lawsuit. Oh, and by the way, sending me private messages won't work. :/ If you must contact me, there's an e-mail address listed on the website in my profile.
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
While I sympathize with this feeling as I have had it on scenarios in the past, I don't know that I'm for there always being an indication of what the scenario will contain. I usually just recruit conservatively if I can and adjust accordingly as it becomes apparent what enemy I am facing. This is more true on the hardest setting in this campaign with the limited gold and high level characters.Elvish Pillager wrote:Not sure if this is practical, but I'd like to have some indication of how difficult the scenario is going to be before starting, so that I don't bring a grossly incorrect amount of forces on my first try.
Agreed, this was one of the few scenarios where I actually felt I was battling for control of a bridge/ford area in order to cross effectively.Elvish Pillager wrote:Water also. Any other terrain is basically just "do I want to give the heroes 30% defense or 60% defense on this tile" but strategically placed water makes actually varied gameplay. The map of "Fear" is quite nice in this regard. (None of the other maps' water is nearly that effective, though. Also, consider more variety than just "each map will have a few everywhere-1-hex-wide rivers in it.")
I believe for the fact that the masked dwarves have put fear into the peasant's hearts with the destruction of their homes/killing them, and the peasant (as noted by his dialogue) runs to his death to avenge his family and friends.Elvish Pillager wrote:"Fear" was fine. (incidentally, how did that scenario get its name? and why does the peasant run straight for his death?)
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
- Elvish_Pillager
- Posts: 8137
- Joined: May 28th, 2004, 10:21 am
- Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.
- Contact:
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
After he was cowering in the village from them? I'm not convinced...Turuk wrote:...the peasant (as noted by his dialogue) runs to his death to avenge his family and friends.
It's all fun and games until someone loses a lawsuit. Oh, and by the way, sending me private messages won't work. :/ If you must contact me, there's an e-mail address listed on the website in my profile.
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
Well he's not suddenly doing it on his own, he's bolstered by burly dwarves who have come to attack those who destroyed his life. Emboldened by their presence, he could easily give in to repressed anger and hate towards the invaders, and make some foolhardy charge.Elvish Pillager wrote:After he was cowering in the village from them? I'm not convinced...Turuk wrote:...the peasant (as noted by his dialogue) runs to his death to avenge his family and friends.
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: April 21st, 2009, 1:14 am
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
I've been quite frustrated with Level 10- The Siege of Kal Kartha.
It's not a matter of gold, or even difficulty (on Normal). It's a matter of time.
I've continually replayed this scenario, and every single time I can't get my troops to the gates in time. All the Allied Dwarves are dead by turn 6-7 depending on how their luck is, and they've surrounded the Steel Clad by turn 8. Which is a bit of a problem considering that give or take a turn it takes me 9 turns to get into skirmish range of the gates.
I can't for the life of my get them to disengage their mad zerg rush to the Gates, and attack my guys instead. Every single team just charges for the gates.
It's not a matter of gold, or even difficulty (on Normal). It's a matter of time.
I've continually replayed this scenario, and every single time I can't get my troops to the gates in time. All the Allied Dwarves are dead by turn 6-7 depending on how their luck is, and they've surrounded the Steel Clad by turn 8. Which is a bit of a problem considering that give or take a turn it takes me 9 turns to get into skirmish range of the gates.
I can't for the life of my get them to disengage their mad zerg rush to the Gates, and attack my guys instead. Every single team just charges for the gates.
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
Which version?
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
I have the same problem as Archaeologist. Version 1,6, even on easy I just don't get there in time. I sent some freshly recruted level1 units ahead, to try and draw the enemy, but except for some wolves I was ignored, they all rushed the gate. And the defending dwarves keep attacking the orcs and leave the hills and mountains. A dwarvish fighter attacking an orcish warrior on grass at night is basically suicide. If they would just stay in the hills and mountains for a few turns it would be doable.
Never seemed to have that problem in 1.4.
Never seemed to have that problem in 1.4.
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
There's no time for this strategy on Easy, either.Archaeologist wrote:I've been quite frustrated with Level 10- The Siege of Kal Kartha.
It's not a matter of gold, or even difficulty (on Normal). It's a matter of time.
I've continually replayed this scenario, and every single time I can't get my troops to the gates in time. All the Allied Dwarves are dead by turn 6-7 depending on how their luck is, and they've surrounded the Steel Clad by turn 8. Which is a bit of a problem considering that give or take a turn it takes me 9 turns to get into skirmish range of the gates.
Which leaves the leaders conveniently unguarded.I can't for the life of my get them to disengage their mad zerg rush to the Gates, and attack my guys instead. Every single team just charges for the gates.
I find this scenario to be critically dependent on both having a horde of Quick Dwarves, and the Gryphon Rider.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: April 21st, 2009, 1:14 am
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
Then it's flawed and really should be reconsidered, at least in the present game environment.
There's barely enough time to get within skirmish range of the Other Orc Armies before the Dwarves are overrun. This is a wee bit of a problem in it's own right. There's also no indication that trying to kill all the leaders within a 10 turn time-frame is not only an option, but even worth considering. It's also misleading to the players to have the turn limit not indicate they're to finish things quickly.
More so, what does it mean for the player who's trying to keep his units alive? "Oh hey, go suicidally zerg rush all your best units into the enemy here. Don't worry, I'm sure 2-3 will survive." It's madness and exasperating. It made me abandon the campaign three times. I understand that the level designer will have an idea for how the player should approach the level, but he shouldn't be punishing the player. There's no flexibility here at all. You're imposing another time limit on top of the game's preexisting conditions such as turn number, and victory conditions.
There's barely enough time to get within skirmish range of the Other Orc Armies before the Dwarves are overrun. This is a wee bit of a problem in it's own right. There's also no indication that trying to kill all the leaders within a 10 turn time-frame is not only an option, but even worth considering. It's also misleading to the players to have the turn limit not indicate they're to finish things quickly.
More so, what does it mean for the player who's trying to keep his units alive? "Oh hey, go suicidally zerg rush all your best units into the enemy here. Don't worry, I'm sure 2-3 will survive." It's madness and exasperating. It made me abandon the campaign three times. I understand that the level designer will have an idea for how the player should approach the level, but he shouldn't be punishing the player. There's no flexibility here at all. You're imposing another time limit on top of the game's preexisting conditions such as turn number, and victory conditions.
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
???Archaeologist wrote:There's barely enough time to get within skirmish range of the Other Orc Armies before the Dwarves are overrun.
I don't get anyone other than the Gryphon rider to the skirmish on Easy; the mages have to wait for armored support before attempting the central orc leader, and the Dwarf Lords/Steelclads don't get to anyone before turn 6. The Gryphon might get a vulnerable orc if the AI dwarves look like they'll provide cover, but other than that none of my forces ever reach the other orc armies.
Make that 7-8 turns. I haven't let the game go on that long, but I'm pretty sure Dulcatulos goes down on turn 9-10 (Easy) if the orcs aren't routed. That means a 12-turn time limit (on Easy) doesn't provide any time pressure at all, although the gold removed this way should be put into the starting gold in the grand finale.Archaeologist wrote:This is a wee bit of a problem in it's own right. There's also no indication that trying to kill all the leaders within a 10 turn time-frame is not only an option, but even worth considering.
As for indication -- problem is that by the time the indication is there (turn 3, when the orcs simply leave their leaders wide-open) you've already committed. I just found it natural to send strike forces aganst all three leaders at once.
The turn limits in THoT appear to be designed to provide gold. In this case, you'll need a lot of it to recruit properly for the grand finale; every little bit helps.Archaeologist wrote:It's also misleading to the players to have the turn limit not indicate they're to finish things quickly.
It is worth noting that ESR also has a guide on how to write campaigns. That guide really doesn't like sharp turn limits.
If only the zerg rush would arrive at all.Archaeologist wrote:More so, what does it mean for the player who's trying to keep his units alive? "Oh hey, go suicidally zerg rush all your best units into the enemy here. Don't worry, I'm sure 2-3 will survive."
That was my first thought about Strange Allies, actually (but the key there is to simply not have your ready-to-promotes arrive first).
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
I just got the Annalist leveled to Loremaster, and he suddenly lost his frames--at least the main one, I haven't fought anyone yet to find out if other frames are there. I'm playing 1.6.1. Is this a known issue?
Re: New campaign: The Hammer of Thursagan
I am also unable to complete Scenario 10 - The Siege of Kal Kartha for the reasons listed above.
wesnoth, 1.6, ubuntu jaunty.
I do it on the middle difficulty level and the orcs just charge and overrun the dwarves before I can get to the leaders. I think I may have killed the Northern orc leader once, but I had known that it was a futile gesture forr about 2 turns by that point - I was just trying it again...
wesnoth, 1.6, ubuntu jaunty.
I do it on the middle difficulty level and the orcs just charge and overrun the dwarves before I can get to the leaders. I think I may have killed the Northern orc leader once, but I had known that it was a futile gesture forr about 2 turns by that point - I was just trying it again...
Re: The Hammer of Thursagan
Hello? Anybody here?
By that I mean, if there's anyone here interested in continuing development of tHoTh... Since campaign still needs a lot of development, IMO...
I also hope this is NOT necroing, because although 2 years has passed since last post, these ones are necro-proof, right?
Right?
By that I mean, if there's anyone here interested in continuing development of tHoTh... Since campaign still needs a lot of development, IMO...
I also hope this is NOT necroing, because although 2 years has passed since last post, these ones are necro-proof, right?
Right?
Artist, writer, game designer for hire.
Art portfolio: https://shino1.artstation.com
Writing dump: https://shino1portfolio.wordpress.com/
My itchio for video games and TTRPG stuff: https://shino1.itch.io/
Art portfolio: https://shino1.artstation.com
Writing dump: https://shino1portfolio.wordpress.com/
My itchio for video games and TTRPG stuff: https://shino1.itch.io/
Re: The Hammer of Thursagan
What are your ideas for further development?
The "recent" posts above are either misplaced (should be in campaign feedback) or left over from its pre-mainline days. I played this campaign on 1.9.6 and had no problems finishing on normal.
The "recent" posts above are either misplaced (should be in campaign feedback) or left over from its pre-mainline days. I played this campaign on 1.9.6 and had no problems finishing on normal.
Re: The Hammer of Thursagan
Just finishing the campaign is not the only aim I guess, it should be both challenging to a certain degree and fun to play.
This campaign is confirmed to have one "broken" scenario (siege). I'm new to Wesnoth and just trying to find out how everything goes here, looks like noone is maintaining The Hammer of Thursagan
This campaign is confirmed to have one "broken" scenario (siege). I'm new to Wesnoth and just trying to find out how everything goes here, looks like noone is maintaining The Hammer of Thursagan