Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
Difficult, 1.14.0
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
4
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Very much.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I liked it.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Weird ally behavior. (Minor Challenge at most.)
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
8
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
Some interactions between the Elensefar riders and Baldras.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
No.
Difficult, 1.14.0
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
4
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Very much.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I liked it.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Weird ally behavior. (Minor Challenge at most.)
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
8
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
Some interactions between the Elensefar riders and Baldras.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
No.
- Attachments
-
Liberty-Glory replay.gz
- I ordered Helicrom to be defensive and to focus on protecting me. He sure doesn't know what that means.
- (65.84 KiB) Downloaded 845 times
-
- Posts: 216
- Joined: September 30th, 2018, 7:31 am
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
- 1.14.5, Easy
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
- 5
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
- Clear, destroy the supports to take down Halstead
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
- Love it. Along with HttT so far, this has to be one of the best endings in Wesnoth campaign. Where TSG failed after building a promising story, Libery redeemed it with this one and made one of the best endings. Plus the after level narration is good. The village does get sadly burned down, yet it shows the fear given by the people of Wesnoth who were forced to become outlaws for the greater good of kingdom
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
- Royal guards, yet if they weren't too suicidal, it'd have been much more challenging.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
- 7
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
- Make Dommel and Royal Guards less sucidial by not going on the field but to stay behind the lines in the forts.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
- No
- 1.14.5, Easy
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
- 5
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
- Clear, destroy the supports to take down Halstead
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
- Love it. Along with HttT so far, this has to be one of the best endings in Wesnoth campaign. Where TSG failed after building a promising story, Libery redeemed it with this one and made one of the best endings. Plus the after level narration is good. The village does get sadly burned down, yet it shows the fear given by the people of Wesnoth who were forced to become outlaws for the greater good of kingdom
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
- Royal guards, yet if they weren't too suicidal, it'd have been much more challenging.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
- 7
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
- Make Dommel and Royal Guards less sucidial by not going on the field but to stay behind the lines in the forts.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
- No
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: July 11th, 2018, 11:41 am
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
Difficult, version 1.14.5.
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
4. With the help of the shadow mages, the Elensefarians and the orcs the defenders of the fortress were so distracted, that they opened up holes in their defense through which my outlaws and fugitives could easily sneak in order to blow up the fortress. I remember from former playthroughs, that without the help of the mages the scenario was a lot more difficult.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
It would be nice to write the way to destroy the fortress into the objectives.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I found it both clear and interesting, although I would have wished for an earlier hint on some secret knowledge on how to destroy the fortress. Otherwise it seems like sheer madness, that Baldras marches his troops there. A second remark: maybe the orc army is a bit over the top, given the fact that orcs were fighting on the queen’s side before (Scenario 3 – A strategy of hope)
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Uhm, finding gaps in the defensive lines for my outlaws to pass through. But I found them.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
7, since it is an interesting task to sneak units through enemy ranks like that. And blowing up a fortress, too.
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
Maybe remove the orc army and make the Elensefarian knights a bit stronger instead.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
No, there wasn’t, since Harper’s dead does not result in a lost game here. He did sadly not return from his venture into the fortress catacombs.
Difficult, version 1.14.5.
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
4. With the help of the shadow mages, the Elensefarians and the orcs the defenders of the fortress were so distracted, that they opened up holes in their defense through which my outlaws and fugitives could easily sneak in order to blow up the fortress. I remember from former playthroughs, that without the help of the mages the scenario was a lot more difficult.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
It would be nice to write the way to destroy the fortress into the objectives.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I found it both clear and interesting, although I would have wished for an earlier hint on some secret knowledge on how to destroy the fortress. Otherwise it seems like sheer madness, that Baldras marches his troops there. A second remark: maybe the orc army is a bit over the top, given the fact that orcs were fighting on the queen’s side before (Scenario 3 – A strategy of hope)
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Uhm, finding gaps in the defensive lines for my outlaws to pass through. But I found them.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
7, since it is an interesting task to sneak units through enemy ranks like that. And blowing up a fortress, too.
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
Maybe remove the orc army and make the Elensefarian knights a bit stronger instead.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
No, there wasn’t, since Harper’s dead does not result in a lost game here. He did sadly not return from his venture into the fortress catacombs.
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
It might be a different tribe than the one that's in Asheviere's service. It's not unusual for different orcish tribes to be on different sides.YanTanTethera wrote: ↑January 3rd, 2019, 4:45 pm A second remark: maybe the orc army is a bit over the top, given the fact that orcs were fighting on the queen’s side before (Scenario 3 – A strategy of hope)
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: July 11th, 2018, 11:41 am
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
Thanks for the remark, I did not look at it like that before.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: January 11th, 2019, 5:55 pm
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
My strategy is just divide my man heading east and west, storming the west together with horses. For the tunnels in the east I actually sneak in by the passable mountain tile, instead of the main gate. That saves lots of trouble as tough loyalists are gathering at the gate for the orcs. Don't know why the royal guard go out to slay the orcs. Finish in 14th turn.
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
normal
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
5 as no need to conserve units
350 gold
can recruit mages, no mage ally
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
ok
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
Very good. Epic battle of heir to throne, in contrast this a epic sneak. Suits the outlaw very much.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
tough guards blocking the way
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
9
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
no
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
no
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
normal
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
5 as no need to conserve units
350 gold
can recruit mages, no mage ally
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
ok
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
Very good. Epic battle of heir to throne, in contrast this a epic sneak. Suits the outlaw very much.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
tough guards blocking the way
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
9
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
no
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
no
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
Hardest available, v1.14.5
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
10. In fact it was unwinnable for me at hard. I tried about 9 times with different tactics as well.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Very clear. The trapdoors are hidden by the guards, but it is clearly explained what the goal is. It may be an idea to have the trap doors empty at first and the first turn of the opponent mans them.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
Very nice! I liked the emotional leaders duo with Harper.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
I tried several tactics, from rush to very defensive to only take one flank first. Neither gave me victory.
I only had about 400 in gold and could recruit the mages. The horses came to my assistance a few turns after start.
Going into detail, if i had to split up my forces, i got wiped by the guards left in the castle. If i tried to hold off the reinforcements in hope the orcs could do more damage the coming night, they wiped me and i hadn't the ressources left to do anything meaningful.
When i one try tried to hold back very defensive and try to lure the one or other enemy into my retreated lines, the reinforcements coming every dawn piled up so much, there was no hope of winning left.
The only thing that let me win this scenario was to dial back the difficulty level one notch. There, it was a piece of cake and no problem at all.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
9. The scenario is a lot of fun, especially because it is not one of the so many "kill enemy leader" ones. Instead, one has to carefully plan out his troop advancements and given the terrain, where, how, and when to attack. This gets even combined with another battle going on on the field, which may (or may not) distract enemy forces. It is tactically challenging and made me enjoy a lot of hours gotten beaten up![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
It would have been a 10 if i had any chance to win this in the first place (ok, i know the problem sits in front of the computer in this case, as others clearly made it in hard setting)
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
It was already a ton of fun. Maybe the friendly AI could act a little more toughtfully, because it threw horses consistently into spearheads.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
In hard, i had to reload very often. I started from the beginning every time in those instances.
It seemed to be mostly the case that my army was wiped or severely damaged in only one or two turns, mostly because i placed my troops badly i think. However, if i place them defensively and attack solely at night, it turns out the reinforcements will wipe me a few turns later or reinforce the castle so strong that either AI is suppressed effectively and enough remains in the castle to make it unwinnable for me.
Hardest available, v1.14.5
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
10. In fact it was unwinnable for me at hard. I tried about 9 times with different tactics as well.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Very clear. The trapdoors are hidden by the guards, but it is clearly explained what the goal is. It may be an idea to have the trap doors empty at first and the first turn of the opponent mans them.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
Very nice! I liked the emotional leaders duo with Harper.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
I tried several tactics, from rush to very defensive to only take one flank first. Neither gave me victory.
I only had about 400 in gold and could recruit the mages. The horses came to my assistance a few turns after start.
Going into detail, if i had to split up my forces, i got wiped by the guards left in the castle. If i tried to hold off the reinforcements in hope the orcs could do more damage the coming night, they wiped me and i hadn't the ressources left to do anything meaningful.
When i one try tried to hold back very defensive and try to lure the one or other enemy into my retreated lines, the reinforcements coming every dawn piled up so much, there was no hope of winning left.
The only thing that let me win this scenario was to dial back the difficulty level one notch. There, it was a piece of cake and no problem at all.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
9. The scenario is a lot of fun, especially because it is not one of the so many "kill enemy leader" ones. Instead, one has to carefully plan out his troop advancements and given the terrain, where, how, and when to attack. This gets even combined with another battle going on on the field, which may (or may not) distract enemy forces. It is tactically challenging and made me enjoy a lot of hours gotten beaten up
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
It would have been a 10 if i had any chance to win this in the first place (ok, i know the problem sits in front of the computer in this case, as others clearly made it in hard setting)
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
It was already a ton of fun. Maybe the friendly AI could act a little more toughtfully, because it threw horses consistently into spearheads.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
In hard, i had to reload very often. I started from the beginning every time in those instances.
It seemed to be mostly the case that my army was wiped or severely damaged in only one or two turns, mostly because i placed my troops badly i think. However, if i place them defensively and attack solely at night, it turns out the reinforcements will wipe me a few turns later or reinforce the castle so strong that either AI is suppressed effectively and enough remains in the castle to make it unwinnable for me.
NEW LoW Linux automated friends script: GitHub project site | Forums post
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
1.14.9, Fugitive (Difficult) (in Ironman mode), played at least twiceContent Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
4. 2 or 3 if I would have known the scripting and sabotage rules before playingContent Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
I chose the option of the allied leader appearing in this battle. My guess (based on them having 500 gold at start) is that this is by far the best alternative.
Not properly clear. I wasnt sure if I had to let the units stay on those tiles for some time or something. Not sure I read the dialog carefully enough though. But I think the scenario objective/s should be precisly written under 'Scenario Objectives' menu point no matter what the dialog says.Content Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Units appearing out of nowhere. If I would have used a different strategy this might have screwed it up.Content Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
There is even a dialog - sth like "They must think Wesnoths army is spread out right now." - which implies that Wesnoths army is not spread out. If new troops are joining later - doesnt that imply that they are spread out?
And the fortress killing is too contrived for my taste.
None.Content Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
8Content Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
Edit: About the 'make it harder': After reading previous post in this thread there probably is a large difficulty discrepancy based on earlier choice in what to do with the shadow mages.Content Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
Make it harder, give precise warning (in the beginning) about new units joining the enemy side at least. Logically it also makes little sense for (slow) heavy infantry to be able to just pop up here without scouts of players side (player side has much better terrain scouts) to know long before they arrive.
About the 'instruct ally' thing: The one thing which (obviously) I would want my allies do is to stay away from the orcs. This is the one most important thing but I have no idea how to make them do that. Or rephrasing: This looks more like an experiment than a useful feature to me.
In terms of 'fluff' it also makes little sense for the allies not to (try to) run out of the fortress after sabotaging it before it is destroyed.
No, I played the campaign without reloading and scenario restarting.Content Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
- Attachments
-
Liberty-Glory replay.gz
- (49.73 KiB) Downloaded 608 times
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
Fugitive (Difficult), 1.15.5
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
5, This scenario could more difficult (on the highest difficulty). I easily managed to beat it in less than half of the turns.
Maybe I had too much gold available.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
clear
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
clear
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
I had no major challenges. The scenario is basically about finding the right time to reach the outposts. This is usually at night.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
6, I liked that there are multiple sides supporting you. There is a lot of variety in this scenario because of these sides.
Therefore, each outpost needs a different approach to reach.
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
I would decrease the turn limit (on the highest difficulty) to make this scenario more challenging.
The starting gold could also be too high for this, especially since it is the last scenario. So your income can be negative without any disadvantage.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
no
Fugitive (Difficult), 1.15.5
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
5, This scenario could more difficult (on the highest difficulty). I easily managed to beat it in less than half of the turns.
Maybe I had too much gold available.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
clear
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
clear
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
I had no major challenges. The scenario is basically about finding the right time to reach the outposts. This is usually at night.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
6, I liked that there are multiple sides supporting you. There is a lot of variety in this scenario because of these sides.
Therefore, each outpost needs a different approach to reach.
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
I would decrease the turn limit (on the highest difficulty) to make this scenario more challenging.
The starting gold could also be too high for this, especially since it is the last scenario. So your income can be negative without any disadvantage.
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
no
- Attachments
-
Liberty-Glory replay 20201003-105424.gz
- (46.41 KiB) Downloaded 505 times
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 7 - Glory
(1) What difficulty levels have you played the scenario on?
1.15.5, Outlaw (Normal), 1.15.6, Fugitve (Hard)
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
6, your leaders are always safe.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Clear.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I like the new reason for the orcish attack.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Distracting the guards so I could sneak by.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
7
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
-
Scenario stats normal:
Campaign stats normal:
Scenario stats hard:
Campaign stats hard:
1.15.5, Outlaw (Normal), 1.15.6, Fugitve (Hard)
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
6, your leaders are always safe.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Clear.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I like the new reason for the orcish attack.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Distracting the guards so I could sneak by.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
7
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
-
Scenario stats normal:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
- Attachments
-
Liberty-Glory replay 20201018-145957.gz
- Hard
- (49.92 KiB) Downloaded 428 times
-
Liberty-Glory replay 20201016-122604.gz
- (42.2 KiB) Downloaded 486 times
- Lord-Knightmare
- Discord Moderator
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: May 24th, 2010, 5:26 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the depths of Irdya, gathering my army to eventually destroy the known world.
- Contact:
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
1. Normal (the middle one), Wesnoth 1.15.11+devContent Feedback wrote: ↑March 10th, 2008, 11:58 pm (1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
2. 7/10
3. 10/10
4. I like this scenario a lot. Storming the most fortified Citadel of Wesnoth. This is certainly something epic.
5. The major challenge was no longer present in Normal as Liberty was rebalanced as a novice-level campaign. There was still the challenge of getting into fortress and quickly taking down a support.
6. 9/10
7. Maybe make my Elensefar ally avoid those support hexes? He placed a lancer on it and I had to wait until it died to trigger the final support.
8. Not really, but I did nearly get Baldras to death's door due to exposing him to three units.
Creator of "War of Legends"
Creator of the Isle of Mists survival scenario.
Maintainer of Forward They Cried
User:Knyghtmare | My Medium
Creator of the Isle of Mists survival scenario.
Maintainer of Forward They Cried
User:Knyghtmare | My Medium
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
1.15.14, Outlaw (Normal). Also sometime back in 1.12 or something.
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
9/10 to try straight up beating the Wesnoth troops. To simply meet the mission objectives would have been simpler, but why not go for the gusto?
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Crystal clear. Go to corners of fortress and knock it down.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
The exchanges between Dommel and the Orc leader were great fun, and it was a nice surprise to see the Elensefar knights appear (well I did remember that bit, but still). The only strange bit was the Wesnoth reinforcements attacking the orcs that were supposed to be part of said reinforcements, but that could be put down to the open hostilities between them and Halstead by that point.
Very clear and consistent writing throughout the whole campaign. Bravo.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Other than the sheer numbers and the income of Dommel's forces, and the regular reinforcements at dawn? No, nothing else that I can think of.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
10/10. It's set up like an epic battle, it feels like an epic battle, it is an epic battle. We can either win via stealthily taking the trapdoors all outlaw-like, or by just beating down the front door for glory (on Normal at least. I remember the hardest difficulty being an epic brawl with the Knights, the orcs, old Helicrom's forces, our outlaws, and the loyalist forces that was almost impossible to fully win.)
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
How?
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
None, but my final plays with sending Harper straight into Dommel's face could have made that happen.
1.15.14, Outlaw (Normal). Also sometime back in 1.12 or something.
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
9/10 to try straight up beating the Wesnoth troops. To simply meet the mission objectives would have been simpler, but why not go for the gusto?
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Crystal clear. Go to corners of fortress and knock it down.
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
The exchanges between Dommel and the Orc leader were great fun, and it was a nice surprise to see the Elensefar knights appear (well I did remember that bit, but still). The only strange bit was the Wesnoth reinforcements attacking the orcs that were supposed to be part of said reinforcements, but that could be put down to the open hostilities between them and Halstead by that point.
Very clear and consistent writing throughout the whole campaign. Bravo.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
Other than the sheer numbers and the income of Dommel's forces, and the regular reinforcements at dawn? No, nothing else that I can think of.
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
10/10. It's set up like an epic battle, it feels like an epic battle, it is an epic battle. We can either win via stealthily taking the trapdoors all outlaw-like, or by just beating down the front door for glory (on Normal at least. I remember the hardest difficulty being an epic brawl with the Knights, the orcs, old Helicrom's forces, our outlaws, and the loyalist forces that was almost impossible to fully win.)
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
How?
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
None, but my final plays with sending Harper straight into Dommel's face could have made that happen.
- Attachments
-
Liberty-Glory replay 20210622-224001.gz
- 1.15.14, Normal, English
- (50.47 KiB) Downloaded 277 times
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
Thanks for the feedback, I did a lot of work on this campaign in 1.15 so happy to see it turned out well. ![Smile ^_^](./images/smilies/icon_smile2.gif)
![Smile ^_^](./images/smilies/icon_smile2.gif)
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: December 1st, 2018, 6:58 pm
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
(1) What difficulty level and version of Wesnoth have you played the scenario on?
1.16.2 Fugitive (Challenging)
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
8. I came into it the first time with way too many Huntsmen and not enough Fugitives or starting gold, so I had to go back and replay the last couple scenarios to get the right recall list. I think if I were a better tactical player I could have figured out how to pick just the right moment to steal a victory, but I preferred to just come in with overwhelming force and do a frontal assault.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
very
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
Very. I played this campaign years ago, actually before I played HttT, so now that I'm playing it again I'm catching all the references to the HttT storyline, which is FANTASTIC. I LOVE the idea that Harper and Baldras and company later meet Konrad himself on the Isle of the Damned. And the writing for the Orc leader is hilarious, “Your army is as useless as you are pink” just cracks me up.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
It's COMPLICATED. The 3 sides interact with each other in unexpected ways, and then your interaction with them also changes their interaction with each other. There are lots of units running around, and the AI operates in an interesting way, where it actually seems to "guard" the corners, but not just by staying totally still, so I had to experiment to see what it took to bait them out. Even the layout is surprisingly complicated, you have to pay close attention to which mountains are impassible, and which parts of the interior of the fortress are 'castle' vs. 'flat'. Which is why I decided to just go with the brute force method!
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
10. Super fun! I like how many ways there are to play it. There are some subtle aspects of it that I really appreciate. Like, the AI has SO MANY PIKEMEN, which are ordinarily a pretty unremarkable unit, but their pierce resistance means that your poacher-type units are MUCH less desirable in this scenario, and it gives the shadow mages a chance to really shine, with their combination of high movement speed and magic cold attacks.
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
It's a work of art, I really like it!
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
I came into it the first time with 4 Huntsmen and no Fugitives, due to some unusual choices earlier in the campaign, and I ended up going back and significantly changing my approach from a couple scenarios back.
1.16.2 Fugitive (Challenging)
(2) How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
8. I came into it the first time with way too many Huntsmen and not enough Fugitives or starting gold, so I had to go back and replay the last couple scenarios to get the right recall list. I think if I were a better tactical player I could have figured out how to pick just the right moment to steal a victory, but I preferred to just come in with overwhelming force and do a frontal assault.
(3) How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
very
(4) How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
Very. I played this campaign years ago, actually before I played HttT, so now that I'm playing it again I'm catching all the references to the HttT storyline, which is FANTASTIC. I LOVE the idea that Harper and Baldras and company later meet Konrad himself on the Isle of the Damned. And the writing for the Orc leader is hilarious, “Your army is as useless as you are pink” just cracks me up.
(5) What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
It's COMPLICATED. The 3 sides interact with each other in unexpected ways, and then your interaction with them also changes their interaction with each other. There are lots of units running around, and the AI operates in an interesting way, where it actually seems to "guard" the corners, but not just by staying totally still, so I had to experiment to see what it took to bait them out. Even the layout is surprisingly complicated, you have to pay close attention to which mountains are impassible, and which parts of the interior of the fortress are 'castle' vs. 'flat'. Which is why I decided to just go with the brute force method!
(6) How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
10. Super fun! I like how many ways there are to play it. There are some subtle aspects of it that I really appreciate. Like, the AI has SO MANY PIKEMEN, which are ordinarily a pretty unremarkable unit, but their pierce resistance means that your poacher-type units are MUCH less desirable in this scenario, and it gives the shadow mages a chance to really shine, with their combination of high movement speed and magic cold attacks.
(7) What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
It's a work of art, I really like it!
(8) Was there any event that caused you to lose the game and forced you to reload or restart the scenario?
I came into it the first time with 4 Huntsmen and no Fugitives, due to some unusual choices earlier in the campaign, and I ended up going back and significantly changing my approach from a couple scenarios back.
- Attachments
-
Liberty-Glory replay 20220403-202040.gz
- (46.46 KiB) Downloaded 200 times
Re: Scenario Review: Liberty 8 - Glory
v. 1.16.10What difficulty levels and game versions have you played the scenario on?
Fugitive / Challenging
6How difficult did you find the scenario? (1-10)
Very clear. The objectives are really unique in this scenario, but it does a great job of explaining them.How clear did you find the scenario objectives?
Same awful "dialect" writing as the rest of the campaign.How clear and interesting did you find the dialog and storyline of the scenario?
I mean, the enemy has a gazillion high-level troops and endless gold, and they're camped out in a fortress. The cool thing about this is you really have to think about how to accomplish the actual scenario objectives, and be smart about how to get that done in the middle of a giant four-way battle. It's rather awesome.What were your major challenges in meeting the objectives of the scenario?
When I played the old version of this campaign years ago, I remember struggling massively with this map, like it was a 9 or 10 difficulty. This time it only seemed moderately hard (6), and I'm not sure why that is. Not sure if there were some changes to reduce the difficulty, or I'm just getting better, or had a better understanding of how to use the rogues, or had more leveled troops and gold after the previous scenario, or maybe I just got lucky. In any case, it's a great map and lots of fun, and felt less insanely hard this time. Also provides a perfect culmination of the rebellion theme.
9, if you don't read the dialog.How fun do you think the scenario is? (1-10)
Fix/revert the writing. In particular for this map and the epilogue, the changed ending feels glib and unsatisfying. And it doesn't make sense that Relana would leave a note just sitting around to let anyone who wanders by know where they went. Bleh.What, if any, are changes you would have made to the scenario to make it more fun?
---------------
About the Overall Campaign:
The maps in this campaign are generally solid and well-done. I like the revisions to the last few scenarios; these are big changes but they seem like an improvement over the old maps. Challenging, interesting, and well-balanced.
But, ugh ... the writing! The "dialect" here feels horribly off and inconsistent. The characters sound like some kind of city-slicker's sarcastic, mocking fantasy of rural people. (A lot of it actually sounds to me more like caricatured Urban Black English, rather than rural speech patterns; but it's false and inconsistent regardless.) Makes it very hard to develop sympathy and identity for the heroes because they come across as goofy caricatures. It's really difficult to write dialect without these problems so I would suggest just not doing it.
In addition, Baldras now comes across mostly as a sad-sack, with no real integrity, ingenuity, agency, or legitimate grievance. It just reeks of the attitude that these people, the actual heroes, are inept and dumb. Also, I understand wanting to make the ending more optimistic, but this also really weakens and eviscerates the story. There are still some high points, like the Monty Python references, but I seem to remember liking this one much better in the past, with the story being its high point. Now it just feels like a bad joke making fun of rural folks; completely ruins the enjoyment.
The "points of interest" throughout the various scenarios are a good addition, but it would be better if they were flagged somehow. Either with a graphical label ("Harper's Spare Bag") or through dialogue ("I left my bag in the northwest; if I can make it up there to pick it up then I'll be able to throw more rocks!") These work well as tactical objectives – deciding if it's worth leaving the battle to go after them – but it was kind of annoying to have to struggle to figure out what they actually do and who needs to go there. Eventually I just looked at the walkthrough for that information, but to avoid pointless hassles it should be clarified in the game itself.
Overall I'd give this campaign 3 out of 5 stars; it would be a lot higher if it weren't for the painful writing. The maps themselves are generally good.